Redefining Resilience: Funding Realities and Grassroots Solutions for a Sustainable Pacific at the 31st SPREP Meeting

Written By: Caet Young, PCFML Strategic Partnerships and Communications Manager

The 31st SPREP Meeting of Officials, an annual gathering that serves as the cornerstone for environmental policy and collaboration among Pacific nations, catalysed renewed energy and focus among diverse stakeholders, all committed to forging a collaborative and sustainable Pacific environment.

The meeting, which comprised representatives from SPREP’s 21 Pacific Island Member countries, 5 Metropolitan Members, the Agence Francaise de Development (AFD), Australian Aid (AUS Aid), European Union (EU), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), UN Environment Program (UNEP), World Bank, alongside other major funders and stakeholders, zeroed in on a collective vision: a resilient Pacific environment that harmoniously sustains both livelihoods and natural heritage. The triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution further accentuates the urgency of this vision. 

With such high stakes, the role of grassroots organisations like Positive Change for Marine Life (PCFML) becomes even more critical. As we delve into the evolving landscape of marine conservation and sustainable waste management in the Pacific, it was heartening to see how the micro-level initiatives of PCFML correlate with the macro-level objectives spearheaded by organisations like the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP).

Whether it’s the development of frameworks, waste management, or improving pollution monitoring systems, the synergy between grassroots initiatives and larger policy frameworks is palpable and essential for a cleaner, healthier, and more resilient Pacific.

While SPREP focuses on building comprehensive frameworks to protect and improve the Pacific environment and to ensure sustainable development for present and future generations, PCFML leans into the rich tapestry of community stories and traditional wisdom to nurture environmental stewardship from the ground up.

Understanding that each community within these nations has unique needs and cultures, our programs aim to complement formal initiatives by instilling a sense of purpose and knowledge at the grassroots level. It’s a synergistic approach: SPREP lays the strategic groundwork and is the catalyst for leveraging efficiencies through a unified Pacific-wide approach. At the same time, we work to have the community voice heard and subsequently work with communities to engage with these structures meaningfully.

SPREP’s dedication to constructing waste management infrastructure through donor-funded projects is pivotal for long-term solutions, but we understand that immediate action is equally crucial. While we may not be building waste treatment plants, our clean-up initiatives and local waste management projects, like Waste to Wealth and Fishing for Change, offer immediate relief to communities. This dual approach serves as a bridge, connecting immediate, tangible results with the more comprehensive, long-term strategies envisioned by SPREP. In doing so, we aim to bring the best of both worlds to bear on the Pacific’s pressing environmental challenges.

Navigating Environmental Funding…

One big issue a majority, if not all, in attendance agreed with is funding. Navigating the labyrinth of environmental funding is an intricate dance that often leaves grassroots organisations feeling out of step. The irony is palpable: financial resources are abundant, thanks to the goodwill of powerful entities like the Blue Action Fund, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and governments from around the globe, including France, Australia, the U.S., Germany, and New Zealand, not to mention the Global Environment Facility (GEF). These large organisations genuinely intend to nurture sustainable development. However, the processes to access, manage, and report on these funds often seem designed for entities with vast administrative resources rather than lean grassroots operations.

Let’s face it—meticulous accounting and sophisticated project management software are luxuries for many community-based organisations. They are experts in their local environments and cultures. Still, they may not have the technological infrastructure or the skill sets to navigate the often byzantine requirements set by international donors. The current funding model often becomes a Catch-22 situation: you need funds to build capacity, but you can’t access those funds without having that capacity.

We need to reimagine this financial framework to be more accessible and less cumbersome without compromising on the essential transparency and accountability that donors rightfully expect. There’s an urgent need to develop systems that meet communities where they are, adopting a more user-friendly approach that can help smaller organisations become effective stewards of environmental funds. Imagine, for instance, funding models built on trust-based philanthropy, where local expertise is valued as much as a well-filled spreadsheet. A move in this direction would democratise and accelerate environmental action, making it a collective effort.

Trust-based philanthropy and innovative funding models offer compelling avenues for grassroots organisations to access much-needed resources. Trust-based philanthropy focuses on unrestricted funding that allows organisations to allocate resources as they see fit and multi-year support for long-term strategic planning. It often features simplified application processes and collaborative grantmaking, where funders work directly with organisations to tailor support to actual needs. Meanwhile, innovative models like participatory grantmaking involve the community in decision-making, from identifying priorities to selecting grantees, ensuring that funding aligns with the most pressing community needs.

Yet, every intricate dance (or running race) has stumbling blocks. For both SPREP and PCFML, a persistent challenge is the scarcity of human resources. Despite national support and enthusiasm, this bottleneck can significantly hamper the speed of implementation, leading to delays that we need help to afford. This is precisely where PCFML’s programs make a tangible difference. By actively involving local communities, we are not just performing immediate tasks but fostering a culture of stewardship. These human capital investments pave the way for quicker action, bridging the gap where formal procedures might slow down the momentum.

On the topic of human capital, there are encouraging signs on the horizon. Initiatives like GEF ISLANDS and the Pacific Ocean Litter Project offer robust frameworks for community empowerment and capacity building—objectives that correlate perfectly with PCML’s core ethos. These programs could serve as catalysts, accelerating the grassroots movements that ultimately feed into broader regional efforts. But let’s not be naive—intentions need the fuel of financial resources to become actions. This is why the emphasis on flexible funding by SPREP’s Chair and other officials is so significant. It resonates deeply with PCFML’s ongoing pursuit of diversified funding streams to ensure the longevity of our grassroots endeavours.

The journey to a cleaner, more sustainable Pacific isn’t just a sprint but a relay race involving multiple stakeholders passing the baton to one another. In this complex choreography, SPREP’s Clean Pacific Roundtable meeting scheduled for 2024 will be a vital forum for exchanging ideas and assessing progress. It aims to facilitate networking and dialogue, improve donor coordination, mobilise technical and financial resources and develop monitoring and reporting methods on the progress of the Cleaner Pacific 2025. These platforms present a unique opportunity for grassroots organisations like PCFML to add layers of nuance to discussions that higher-level bureaucratic perspectives might otherwise dominate. Our lived experiences in waste management and marine conservation provide invaluable insights that can guide and even recalibrate regional strategies.

Here’s the crux—before we look outward to build a robust regional mechanism, we urgently need to strengthen our local capacities. As we solidify the foundations of individual communities, we equip them to contribute to a coordinated, regional movement. Therefore, while we navigate the crowded space of potential partners and donors, our primary focus remains, as ever, on fortifying the grassroots level from which all lasting change springs.

As we navigate the complexities of marine conservation, waste management, and sustainable living, the synergy between grassroots initiatives like those at PCFML and broader objectives like those of SPREP becomes increasingly clear. Whether tapping into the rich vein of community stories or navigating the maze of global funding, our efforts are complementary, and their integration is a prerequisite for meaningful, lasting impact. We may operate at different scales, but our goals are inextricably linked. Whether we’re looking at it from the grassroots or the policy level, one thing is certain: collaboration is not just beneficial; it’s essential. As we align our efforts, the dream of a cleaner, healthier Pacific becomes not just a lofty aspiration but an achievable reality.

As we continue to align our work with SPREP and other stakeholders, let’s not forget that every individual action counts. Whether it’s volunteering for a local beach clean-up, reducing your own use of plastics, advocating for more accessible funding models, or sharing knowledge within your community, each of us can contribute to a cleaner, more sustainable Pacific. So, take a moment today to consider how you can play your part.

The dream of a healthier Pacific isn’t just a lofty aspiration; it’s an achievable reality with coordinated action and mutual support. Together, we can and will make a difference.

Back to blog